Comparison of Long-Term Clinical Outcome Between Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Infarct-Related Artery-Only Revascularization for Patients With ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction With Cardiogenic Shock

Citations

WEB OF SCIENCE

22
Citations

SCOPUS

24

초록

Background Data are limited regarding long-term outcomes in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease presenting with cardiogenic shock according to revascularization strategy. We sought to compare the 3-year clinical outcomes of patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction multivessel disease with cardiogenic shock and patients with multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and infarct-related artery (IRA)-only PCI. Methods and Results Of 13 104 patients from the nationwide, multicenter, prospective KAMIR-NIH (Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry--National Institutes of Health) registry, we selected 659 patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction who had concomitant non-IRA stenosis and presented with cardiogenic shock. The primary outcome was all-cause death. Multivessel PCI was performed in 260 patients and IRA-only PCI in 399 patients. At 3 years, patients in the multivessel PCI group had a lower risk of all-cause death (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.45-0.94 [P=0.024]), all-cause death or MI (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.41-0.84 [P=0.004]), and non-IRA repeat revascularization (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.10-0.50 [P<0.001]) than those in the IRA-only PCI group. The results were consistent after confounder adjustment by propensity score matching and inverse probability weighting analysis. Landmark analysis at 1 year demonstrated that the multivessel PCI group had a lower risk of recurrent MI and non-IRA repeat revascularization beyond 1 year (log-rank P=0.030 and P=0.017, respectively) than the IRA-only PCI group. Conclusions In patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock, multivessel PCI was associated with a lower risk of all-cause death than IRA-only PCI at 3 years, suggesting potential benefit of non-IRA revascularization during the index hospitalization to improve long-term clinical outcomes.

키워드

cardiogenic shock; complete revascularization; multivessel disease; outcomes; percutaneous coronary intervention; ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; DISEASE; ANGIOPLASTY; LESION
제목
Comparison of Long-Term Clinical Outcome Between Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Infarct-Related Artery-Only Revascularization for Patients With ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction With Cardiogenic Shock
저자
Lee, Joo Myung; Rhee, Tae-Min; Kim, Hyun Kuk; Hwang, Doyeon; Lee, Seung Hun; Choi, Ki Hong; Kim, Jihoon; Park, Taek Kyu; Yang, Jeong Hoon; Song, Young Bin; Choi, Jin-Ho; Choi, Seung-Hyuk; Koo, Bon-Kwon; Chae, Shung Chull; Cho, Myeong-Chan; Kim, Chong Jin; Kim, Ju Han; Kim, Hyo-Soo; Gwon, Hyeon-Cheol; Jeong, Myung Ho; Hahn, Joo-Yong
DOI
10.1161/JAHA.119.013870
발행일
2019-12-17
유형
Article
저널명
Journal of the American Heart Association
권
8
호
24