상세 보기
Patient-reported Outcomes from JAVELIN Bladder 100: Avelumab First-line Maintenance Plus Best Supportive Care Versus Best Supportive Care Alone for Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma
- Grivas, Petros;
- Kopyltsov, Evgeny;
- Su, Po-Jung;
- Parnis, Francis X.;
- Park, Se Hoon;
- 외 11명
WEB OF SCIENCE
51SCOPUS
51초록
Background: In JAVELIN Bladder 100, avelumab first-line maintenance plus best sup-portive care (BSC) significantly prolonged overall survival (OS; primary endpoint) versus BSC alone in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC) without disease pro-gression with first-line platinum-containing chemotherapy.Objective: To evaluate patient-reported outcomes (PROs) with avelumab plus BSC ver-sus BSC alone.Design, setting, and participants: A randomized phase 3 trial (NCT02603432) was con-ducted in 700 patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma that had not progressed with first-line gemcitabine plus cisplatin or carboplatin. PROs were a secondary endpoint.Intervention: Avelumab plus BSC (n = 350) or BSC alone (n = 350). Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: National Comprehensive Cancer Network/Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Bladder Symptom Index-18 (FBlSI-18) and EuroQol five-level EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L) assessments were analyzed using descriptive statistics and mixed-effect models. Time to deterioration (TTD; prespecified definition: a >= 3-point decrease from baseline in the FBlSI-18 disease-related symptoms-physical subscale for two consecutive assessments) was evaluated via Kaplan -Meier analyses.Results and limitations: Completion rates for scheduled on-treatment PRO assessments were >90% (overall and average per assessment). Results from descriptive analyses and mixed-effect or repeated-measures models of FBlSI-18 and EQ-5D-5L were similar between arms. TTD was also similar, both in the prespecified analysis (hazard ratio 1.26 [95% confidence interval: 0.90, 1.77]) and in the post hoc analyses including off -treatment assessments and different event definitions. Limitations included the open -label design and limited numbers of evaluable patients at later time points.Conclusions: Addition of avelumab first-line maintenance to BSC in patients with aUC that had not progressed with first-line platinum-containing chemotherapy prolonged OS, with a relatively minimal effect on quality of life.Patient summary: In this trial of people with advanced urothelial carcinoma who had ben-efited from first-line chemotherapy (ie, had stable disease or reduced tumor size), treat-ment with avelumab maintenance plus best supportive care (BSC) versus BSC alone improved survival significantly, without compromising quality of life, as reported by the patients themselves.(c) 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of European Association of Urology. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creative-commons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
키워드
- 제목
- Patient-reported Outcomes from JAVELIN Bladder 100: Avelumab First-line Maintenance Plus Best Supportive Care Versus Best Supportive Care Alone for Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma
- 저자
- Grivas, Petros; Kopyltsov, Evgeny; Su, Po-Jung; Parnis, Francis X.; Park, Se Hoon; Yamamoto, Yoshiaki; Fong, Peter C.; Tournigand, Christophe; Duran, Miguel A. Climent; Bamias, Aristotelis; Caserta, Claudia; Chang, Jane; Cislo, Paul; di Pietro, Alessandra; Wang, Jing; Powles, Thomas
- 발행일
- 2023-04
- 유형
- Article
- 저널명
- European Urology
- 권
- 83
- 호
- 4
- 페이지
- 320 ~ 328