Angiotensin Receptor Blockers Versus Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitors in Acute Myocardial Infarction Without Heart Failure

Citations

WEB OF SCIENCE

2

초록

BACKGROUND: Whether angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) can be an alternative to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) in patients without heart failure (HF) after acute myocardial infarction (MI) remains controversial. The aim of this study was to compare clinical outcomes between initial ARB and ACEI therapy in patients with MI without HF. METHODS: Between 2010 and 2016, a total of 31,013 patients who underwent coronary revascularization for MI with prescription of ARBs or ACEIs at hospital discharge were enrolled from the Korean nationwide medical insurance data. Patients who had HF at index MI were excluded. The primary outcome was all-cause death. The secondary outcomes included recurrent MI, hospitalization for new heart HF, stroke, and a composite of each outcome. RESULTS: Of 31,013 patients, ARBs were prescribed in 12,685 (40.9%) and ACEIs in 18,328 (59.1%). Patients receiving ARBs had a lower discontinuation rate compared with those receiving ACEIs (28.2% vs 43.5%, adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.34; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.31-0.37; P < .01). During a median follow-up of 2.2 years, 2480 patients died. The incidence rate of all-cause death in patients receiving ARBs and those receiving ACEIs was 27.7 and 22.9 per 1000 person-years, respectively (adjusted HR 1.04; 95% CI 0.95-1.13; P = .40). There were no significant differences in the secondary outcomes between patients receiving ARBs and those receiving ACEIs, except stroke (19.2 vs 13.6 per 1000 personyears; adjusted HR 1.17; 95% CI 1.04-1.32; P = .01). In a subgroup analysis, a higher mortality was observed with ARBs compared with ACEIs in patients with diabetes. CONCLUSIONS: In this nationwide cohort, there was no significant difference in the incidence of all-cause death between ARBs and ACEIs as discharge medications in patients with myocardial infarction without heart failure. Angiotensin II receptor blockers would be an alternative to ACEIs for those intolerant to (c) 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies. center dot The American Journal of Medicine (2024) 137:1088-1096

키워드

Angiotensin II receptor blockers; Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors; myocardial infarction; heart failure; CARDIOVASCULAR EVENTS; HIGH-RISK; MORTALITY; OUTCOMES; INTERVENTION; TELMISARTAN; PREVENTION; OLMESARTAN; MORBIDITY; CAPTOPRIL
제목
Angiotensin Receptor Blockers Versus Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitors in Acute Myocardial Infarction Without Heart Failure
저자
Kim, Jihoon; Kang, Danbee; Park, Hyejeong; Park, Taek Kyu; Lee, Joo Myung; Yang, Jeong Hoon; Song, Young Bin; Choi, Jin-Ho; Choi, Seung-Hyuk; Gwon, Hyeon-Cheol; Guallar, Eliseo; Cho, Juhee; Hahn, Joo-Yong
DOI
10.1016/j.amjmed.2024.07.020
발행일
2024-11
유형
Article
저널명
American Journal of Medicine
권
137
호
11
페이지
1088 ~ 1096.e4